event-trade登录编辑
🐦 推特SerenityV1 · 实盘不做把握 8/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 03-24 20:46:03时区推断·⟳ 抓取 06-03 23:08:12回填·⚡ 决策 06-18 00:12:14·131.7 天前

KOL发帖安抚SOI等持仓下跌,归因宏观利空并重申硅光子基本面

📄 原文Serenity↗ 原文
Not a fan of these types of posts, but I’ll do one today again: When a stock like $SOI drops 6% and reverses a lot of i…
不做 SOI.US
KOL持仓辩护与情绪按摩帖,无新信息增量与催化剂;短期受宏观利空(地缘冲突、巴黎股市大跌)压制,缺乏短期事件驱动edge,长线逻辑不构成当下交易信号。
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)

研究档案

这条决策没有研究档案。

原文全文

展开原文 · 1,155 字
Not a fan of these types of posts, but I’ll do one today again:

When a stock like $SOI drops 6% and reverses a lot of its gains this week:

Nothing about SOI substrates thesis for silicon photonics / CPO level monopoly has changed.

Unfortunately, the broader index (Paris Stock Index) crashed 9% this month and keeps going down.

And broader macro from the War in Iran drives down a lot of names.

Not every name I mention like $AXTI can go in a straight line up but they tend to be strong outperformers.

I’ll post if my thesis materially changed.

But if a stock price drops because of macro or just a slight correction after rising 400% like $AAOI.

Or if $SIVE dropped 16% on Friday before rising 35% on Monday…

Short term stock prices does not chance a thesis.

And it shouldn’t to your conviction either.

Especially with names, if I don’t mention them for a bit like, $IQE that’s just in a waiting period for restructuring or asset sales. Or $NBIS that’s in its silent buildout phase for extreme q4 revenue ramp.

Performance like these are sometimes byproducts of macro.

But if they can go down 10% in one week, they can go up 10% the next.

决策记录链 · 只追加

每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。

这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。