event-trade登录编辑
🐦 推特SerenityV1 · 实盘不做把握 3/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 03-26 16:33:42时区推断·⟳ 抓取 06-03 23:04:21回填·⚡ 决策 06-17 23:49:13·131.8 天前

KOL梳理光收发器PCB瓶颈逻辑,点名SANM与TTMI但自身不看好

📄 原文Serenity↗ 原文
So if you care about the second optical transicever bottleneck outside of EML/CW Lasers: - $SANM (US) - $TTMI (US) - WU…
不做 SANM.US
KOL逻辑梳理帖,缺乏新催化剂,引用的AVGO发言为旧闻,且作者明确表示无持仓并认为激光器瓶颈更具吸引力,无短期交易edge。
不做 TTMI.US
KOL逻辑梳理帖,缺乏新催化剂,引用的AVGO发言为旧闻,且作者明确表示无持仓并认为激光器瓶颈更具吸引力,无短期交易edge。
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)

研究档案

这条决策没有研究档案。

原文全文

展开原文 · 1,030 字
So if you care about the second optical transicever bottleneck outside of EML/CW Lasers:

- $SANM (US)
- $TTMI (US)
- WUS Printed Circuit (TPE: 2316)
- Unimicron (TPE: 3037)
- Zhen Ding Tech (TPE: 4958)
- Gold Circuit Electronics (TPE: 2368)

Were winners for the optical transceiver PCB bottleneck.

There's some downstream players like FIC Global that benefits, not so much as a Fab but assembly.

Others like Unimicron are likely too large with other segments like ABF substrates to feel much of a difference.

US plays are more-so from reshoring to US supply chains, even though Chinese and Taiwanese players were main beneficaries.

$AVGO quote:

"Both Taiwanese and Chinese PCB suppliers are facing capacity limits, contributing to the delays, Ramachandran said, without naming the suppliers."

I have no open long positions in any of these right now.

I could be wrong, but I felt laser chokepoints ( $LITE, $SIVE, $MTSI, $COHR, Sumitomo) in optical supply chains to be much more compelling for structural re-rating.

决策记录链 · 只追加

每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。

这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。