🐦 推特SerenityV1 · 实盘不做把握 8/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 04-21 05:03:14时区推断·⟳ 抓取 06-03 20:34:42回填·⚡ 决策 06-17 07:09:13·132.6 天前
KOL回顾SOI与RPI翻倍并喊单SIVE的CPO光子学概念
📄 原文Serenity↗ 原文
Just 1 month ago, journalists and media tried downplaying my $SOI and $RPI thesis. As “meme stocks that were set to cra…
不做 SOI.US
KOL回顾性喊单，标的已涨100%，迟到的清单疑似出货，无edge
不做 RPI.US
KOL回顾性喊单，标的已涨100%，迟到的清单疑似出货，无edge
不做 SIVE.US
纯社媒KOL喊单小盘股，无一手官方公告证实CPO超大规模客户认证进展，未证实的完美利好，疑似炒作
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)
研究档案
这条决策没有研究档案。
原文全文
展开原文 · 998 字
Just 1 month ago, journalists and media tried downplaying my $SOI and $RPI thesis.
As “meme stocks that were set to crash” citing my WSB tag without analyzing the underlying thesis.
They’re both up 100% and held their gains.
Same is happening to companies like $SIVE.
I never argue from authority… but since they’re going that route:
I’m curious why… in their narratives they just leave out the fact I published fundamental AI papers in places like Nature with thousands of citations?
Other the fact other analysts on X positive about $SIVE today have Ph.Ds from places like UC Berkeley and publish in the photonics space?
It’s always the English or non-technical graduates that go out in the media and have the strongest opinion about CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles and supply chain mapping.
It just feels like institutions hate it when a retail investors on X know what they’re talking about.
A thesis should live and die based on merit, not the authority of who is comes from.
As “meme stocks that were set to crash” citing my WSB tag without analyzing the underlying thesis.
They’re both up 100% and held their gains.
Same is happening to companies like $SIVE.
I never argue from authority… but since they’re going that route:
I’m curious why… in their narratives they just leave out the fact I published fundamental AI papers in places like Nature with thousands of citations?
Other the fact other analysts on X positive about $SIVE today have Ph.Ds from places like UC Berkeley and publish in the photonics space?
It’s always the English or non-technical graduates that go out in the media and have the strongest opinion about CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles and supply chain mapping.
It just feels like institutions hate it when a retail investors on X know what they’re talking about.
A thesis should live and die based on merit, not the authority of who is comes from.
决策记录链 · 只追加
每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。
这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。