🐦 推特SerenityV1 · 实盘不做把握 3/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 06-06 16:37:22时区推断·⟳ 抓取 06-06 16:40:15·⚡ 决策 06-16 18:10:02 +10d01h·132.9 天前
KOL推测XFAB硅光子业务有望获英伟达2027年CPO订单
📄 原文Serenity↗ 原文
Okay... just some more weekend shower thoughts about $XFAB. I still feel like it could be the next $TSEM, just early st…
不做 XFAB.US
KOL推测性长逻辑,'英伟达评估并量产'缺乏一手官方证实,且量产时间线在2027年下半年,短期无实质催化剂与交易edge,属于未证实传闻。
不做 TSEM.US
仅作为对标公司被提及,事件对其无直接影响与催化剂。
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)
研究档案
这条决策没有研究档案。
原文全文
展开原文 · 2,000 字
Okay... just some more weekend shower thoughts about $XFAB.
I still feel like it could be the next $TSEM, just early stage at a $1.4B MC?
They kinda leapfrogged current gens (which $TSEM are getting volume from) to compete for H2 2027 CPO scale up inflection point ($ASX docs cite Xfab (aka. photonixFAB) as focusing on CPO)
By building out some black magic MTP (transfer printing) architecture for lasers w/ other stuff like TFLN.
Basically next-gen integration IP, they're still behind on yields, sure.
But $NVDA evaluating it for transceivers/switches to see if it can volume ramp. That $NOK sets the specifications/assembly for. (nvidia invested in nokia for this these switches/networking too btw).
And if their MTP supply chain works... (eg. with Smartphotonics providing lasers, EU players doing assembly).
It basically volume ramps with $NVDA just like why Nvidia signed long term agreements with $TSEM?
Downside risk?
Already below replacement book value, can always go lower yeah, but typically to a certain point.
Maybe more CHIPS act subsidies next few months from chips act 2. If it doesn't go well there's SiC (152% Y/Y Growth, 195% Y/Y SiC wafer shipment growth)/GaN power semi upside.
Europeans /LLMs will say "oh evaluations doesn't mean it's a future contract!".
This is kinda different since the European Union is behind this effort and $XFAB for soverign photonic supply chains.
Not your typical company + hyperscaler evaluation, since $NVDA wants to be nice to Europe's regulators. They'd prob be pissed if nvidia just stayed in US/Taiwan/China.
So if they can make this MTP black magic work with mass production, feels almost for sure nvidia/nokia volume ramp on some tiny $1.4B silicon photonics foundry or at least throw them a bone with smaller contracts.
In terms of timelines, maybe just a months early since it volume ramps H2 2027/H1 2028 (which happens to be in line with CPO scale up timelines)...
Or just unknown because they named their project som
I still feel like it could be the next $TSEM, just early stage at a $1.4B MC?
They kinda leapfrogged current gens (which $TSEM are getting volume from) to compete for H2 2027 CPO scale up inflection point ($ASX docs cite Xfab (aka. photonixFAB) as focusing on CPO)
By building out some black magic MTP (transfer printing) architecture for lasers w/ other stuff like TFLN.
Basically next-gen integration IP, they're still behind on yields, sure.
But $NVDA evaluating it for transceivers/switches to see if it can volume ramp. That $NOK sets the specifications/assembly for. (nvidia invested in nokia for this these switches/networking too btw).
And if their MTP supply chain works... (eg. with Smartphotonics providing lasers, EU players doing assembly).
It basically volume ramps with $NVDA just like why Nvidia signed long term agreements with $TSEM?
Downside risk?
Already below replacement book value, can always go lower yeah, but typically to a certain point.
Maybe more CHIPS act subsidies next few months from chips act 2. If it doesn't go well there's SiC (152% Y/Y Growth, 195% Y/Y SiC wafer shipment growth)/GaN power semi upside.
Europeans /LLMs will say "oh evaluations doesn't mean it's a future contract!".
This is kinda different since the European Union is behind this effort and $XFAB for soverign photonic supply chains.
Not your typical company + hyperscaler evaluation, since $NVDA wants to be nice to Europe's regulators. They'd prob be pissed if nvidia just stayed in US/Taiwan/China.
So if they can make this MTP black magic work with mass production, feels almost for sure nvidia/nokia volume ramp on some tiny $1.4B silicon photonics foundry or at least throw them a bone with smaller contracts.
In terms of timelines, maybe just a months early since it volume ramps H2 2027/H1 2028 (which happens to be in line with CPO scale up timelines)...
Or just unknown because they named their project som
决策记录链 · 只追加
每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。
这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。