🐦 推特aleabitoredditV1 · 实盘不做把握 3/10
北京时间·源无时间·以抓取为准·⟳ 抓取 06-11 09:38:21回填·⚡ 决策 06-16 13:16:36·133.6 天前
KOL发帖看好Foci(3363)与HIMX为NVDA/TSM光学项目瓶颈,指机构打压吸筹
📄 原文aleabitoreddit↗ 原文
Basically this… and it’s how cycles work. Retail was early and completely frontran institutions on next architectural s…
不做 HIMX.US
纯KOL情绪喊单与阴谋论,底层CPO/光学逻辑为老主线,无新催化剂或订单公告,缺乏交易edge
不做 3363.TW
纯KOL情绪喊单,底层光学互连逻辑已充分炒作,无新基本面催化,阴谋论看多不具备可操作性
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)
研究档案
这条决策没有研究档案。
原文全文
展开原文 · 1,545 字
Basically this… and it’s how cycles work.
Retail was early and completely frontran institutions on next architectural shifts.
There was close to 0 US institutional ownership on $SIVE.
And now you see active institutions like JP Morgan, Fidelity Research, and others on the cap table.
Happened last year with $NBIS.
> I called out close to <30% institutional accumulation and said they wanted more shares.
> institutions bought up majority of the float
> bunch of negative articles back then, now it’s positive and ATHs.
Two years before it was $RKLB
> Was long at $16, but institutional analysts kept giving record low PTs and told retail to sell, although it had such a high reusable rocket rate.
> retail sold, institutional ownership stocked up
> now it’s ATHs
I expect Foci (3363) to be a bottleneck for both $NVDA and $TSM optical programs and now there’s firms implying you to sell that at $2.5B valuations alongside $HIMX.
So if you see negative sellside reports or an uncanny wave of negative news, if’s a good signal they need liquidity.
Recently some smaller hedge funds have been so desperate that they’re likely even using bot farms on X that told retail to sell lol… which I’ve uncovered recently.
Regardless, it’s also why I spend a lot of time doing research on individual names so people can build their own conviction in the face of noise.
Unfortunately, it’s just a part of life how the modern liquidity cycles/transfers of US retail -> Institutions work.
They don’t work in the best interest of retail investors.
Retail was early and completely frontran institutions on next architectural shifts.
There was close to 0 US institutional ownership on $SIVE.
And now you see active institutions like JP Morgan, Fidelity Research, and others on the cap table.
Happened last year with $NBIS.
> I called out close to <30% institutional accumulation and said they wanted more shares.
> institutions bought up majority of the float
> bunch of negative articles back then, now it’s positive and ATHs.
Two years before it was $RKLB
> Was long at $16, but institutional analysts kept giving record low PTs and told retail to sell, although it had such a high reusable rocket rate.
> retail sold, institutional ownership stocked up
> now it’s ATHs
I expect Foci (3363) to be a bottleneck for both $NVDA and $TSM optical programs and now there’s firms implying you to sell that at $2.5B valuations alongside $HIMX.
So if you see negative sellside reports or an uncanny wave of negative news, if’s a good signal they need liquidity.
Recently some smaller hedge funds have been so desperate that they’re likely even using bot farms on X that told retail to sell lol… which I’ve uncovered recently.
Regardless, it’s also why I spend a lot of time doing research on individual names so people can build their own conviction in the face of noise.
Unfortunately, it’s just a part of life how the modern liquidity cycles/transfers of US retail -> Institutions work.
They don’t work in the best interest of retail investors.
决策记录链 · 只追加
每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。
这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。