event-trade登录编辑
🐦 推特SerenityV1 · 实盘不做把握 3/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 11:16:44时区推断·⟳ 抓取 11:19:05·⚡ 决策 06-23 11:26:15 +7m10s·126.4 天前

KOL重申CW laser与CPO产业瓶颈逻辑,看好LITE及光通信供应链

📄 原文Serenity↗ 原文
IMO photonics theme + CW laser chokepoint is goated. It's legit like markets have short term memory loss and forgot how…
不做 LITE.US
KOL重申CW laser与CPO已知产业逻辑,无短期新催化剂,底层趋势已部分price-in,缺乏事件驱动edge
不做 NVDA.US
大盘股,KOL逻辑帖对NVDA无短期边际影响,不具备事件驱动交易价值
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)

研究档案

这条决策没有研究档案。

原文全文

展开原文 · 1,267 字
IMO photonics theme + CW laser chokepoint is goated.

It's legit like markets have short term memory loss and forgot how $LITE went from $3B -> $65B+ from 2024 to now.

Because $NVDA caused EML bottlenecks, and forced architectural changes.

We're literally seeing the same thing today with CW lasers + 1.6T/CPO shifts with Nvidia signing LTAs everywhere.

Now, $AMD + other CSPs are hunting for remaining scraps with large LTAs for CW lasers + optical components.

GS Research's ~9-10x $154B optical TAM in 2028 and near $0 -> $91B CPO TAM in just 2 1/2 years.

Don't just magically disappear from a month of trading volatility.

$AAOI sitting at ~$13B, $SIVE sitting at ~$3B, and other CW laser players look strategically very valuable.

And next year I think we'll look back and say "Why didn't I learn my lesson the first time with EML from Nvidia and pick up CW laser adjacent names!"

Then there's likely gonna be some new mini trend 1-2 years from now like microled or quantum dot and we're gonna see the same thing repeat.

Think Sumitomo's projections with CW laser share + silicon photonics being majority / dominant architecture should be correct.

I'm personally just focusing on that bottleneck as you've seen with $SOI, $TSEM, $SIVE, and others.

决策记录链 · 只追加

每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。

这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。