event-trade登录编辑
🐦 推特SemiAnalysisV3 · 实盘不做把握 8/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 00:47:35时区推断·⟳ 抓取 00:55:36·⚡ 决策 06-30 01:19:21 +23m45s·119.6 天前

SemiAnalysis 戏仿帖:虚构『2001 年微软 CEO 称开源操作系统危险』,实为讽刺当下开源 AI 危险论

📄 原文SemiAnalysis@SemiAnalysis_↗ 原文
JUNE 1, 2001 🚨MICROSOFT CEO: OPEN-SOURCE OPERATING SYSTEMS ARE DANGEROUS $MSFT CEO Bill Gates told lawmakers that open-…
不做 MSFT.US
该帖为 SemiAnalysis 讽刺/戏仿内容(抬头2001年、称 Gates 为 CEO 均与史实矛盾——2001 年微软 CEO 已是 Ballmer),借古讽今影射当下『开源 AI 危险论』,并非真实新闻;无任何可交易催化剂,且即便为真,25 年前关于开源 OS 的言论对 3.7 万亿市值的 MSFT 也零相关。属未证实/虚构噪音,回避。
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)

研究档案

🔎 新鲜度:扩散 low · price-in 风险 low ↗

主要风险

  • 误把讽刺/戏仿帖当真实新闻交易,会在零催化剂下乱动一只超大盘股

原文全文

展开原文 · 1,847 字
JUNE 1, 2001
🚨MICROSOFT CEO: OPEN-SOURCE OPERATING SYSTEMS ARE DANGEROUS

$MSFT CEO Bill Gates told lawmakers that open-source operating systems such as Linux are "going down a very dangerous path." Transcript below ⬇️

"""
The scaling of open source operating systems, I think it's going down a very dangerous path. And again, if the path continues, I think we could get to a very dangerous place.

I think it's worth saying some things on Linux that are clear to all the experts, but I want to make sure is understood by this committee, which is when you control the operating system and you're shipping it, you have the ability to monitor its usage. It might be misused at one point, but then you can push an update. You can revoke a user's license. You can change what the system is willing to run.

When an operating system is released in an uncontrolled manner, by some guy compiling his own kernel in his basement, there's no ability to do that. It's entirely out of your hands. And so I think that should be attended to carefully.

There may be ways to release software open source so that it's harder to circumvent the licensing, but that's a much harder problem, and we should confront the advocates of this with that problem and challenge them to solve it.

Finally, I'd say open source is a little bit of a misnomer here, right? Open source normally refers to smaller developers who are iterating quickly, and I think that's a good thing. But here we're talking about something a little bit different, which is a more uncontrolled release of larger systems by, again, to your point, Senator Hawley, like much larger entities that pay tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars to develop them. I think we should think of that in a little bit of a different category, and their obligations in a little bit of a different category.
"""

决策记录链 · 只追加

每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。

这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。