event-trade登录编辑
🐦 推特SerenityCodex · 实盘不做把握 6/10不做原因:无增量信息
北京时间·🕒 发布 16:26:19时区推断·⟳ 抓取 16:26:23·⚡ 决策 08-25 16:29:44 +3m21s·62.9 天前

Serenity复盘AI光通信、MLCC、InP与CPO激光供应链主题,未披露新的可核验公司催化

这是一条高影响力账号的主题复盘和财报前猜测,不是新增订单、正式客户确认、价格上调、产能锁定或业绩指引;受益逻辑可以列入观察,但当前不具备可执行正期望。

📄 原文Serenity@aleabitoreddit↗ 原文
off the top of my head, just a recap of the themes I'm tracking: - MLCC (actively price hiking AI server MLCCs, tighten…
不做 Sivers Semiconductors(SIVE.SE)
不做Sivers Semiconductors(SIVE.ST):本条只是社媒主题复盘和财报前猜测,没有新增订单、客户确认、金额或指引;等待2026-08-27财报验证。
不做 Lumentum(LITE.US)
不做Lumentum(LITE.US):正文对其产能分配的判断未获公司确认,且方向为需求强与外供受限并存。
不做 Coherent(COHR.US)
不做Coherent(COHR.US):本条没有新增订单、产能锁定或指引变化,只有供应链观点。
不做 Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI.US)
不做Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI.US):被点名为潜在被接触供应商,但未披露客户、认证、订单或金额。
不做 MACOM Technology Solutions(MTSI.US)
不做MACOM Technology Solutions(MTSI.US):推文未提供可核验的公司级新增事实或量级。
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)

研究档案

结论摘要

事件核心是AI光通信和上游材料供应链复盘,最强映射是Sivers的CPO/CW laser瓶颈叙事;但正文没有提供新的客户、订单、金额或指引,关键验证点仍要等2026-08-27财报。社媒影响可能带来短线情绪,但缺少基本面增量和先例锚点,当前选择不做。

🔎 新鲜度:最早出现 2026-08-25 · 扩散 medium · price-in 风险 high ↗ ↗

消息传播链

  1. 2026-06-02官方确认/否认Sivers Semiconductors官网一手源原文 ↗
    Sivers此前已公告与GlobalFoundries推进AI数据中心光学解决方案,说明CPO相关叙事不是本次首次出现。
  2. 2026-08-25 08:26 UTC首发X/Serenity非一手原文 ↗
    本次推文为主题复盘和财报前猜测,未披露新订单、客户确认或指引。
    市场反应:事件发生时Sivers所在欧洲市场未给出可交易确认,A股和港股已收盘。

关键理由

  • Sivers确有CPO/InP/CW laser供应链高弹性主题敞口,但本次推文没有新增订单金额或客户确认。
  • Lumentum、Coherent、AAOI、MACOM等被点名反映行业关注度,但正文只给观点和猜测,不能直接量化到收入或利润。
  • 量级核查无法完成:本条未披露新增订单、ASP、产能锁定或份额,因此无法计算增量占收入、利润或市值比例。

主要风险

  • 若Sivers在2026-08-27财报确认大客户认证、产能锁定或订单金额,当前不做可能错过财报前预期交易。
  • Serenity账号影响力高,开盘后相关小市值AI供应链股票可能被情绪资金推高,但无新增事实时追高容易变成拥挤交易。

反向证据

  • 做多前查反向 · 来源 web · 日期 2026-06-02 · 影响 weakens
    核心利好叙事已有官方合作和市场传播,本条缺少新增事实。
    检索:Sivers Semiconductors CPO laser bottleneck prior coverage GlobalFoundries fundraise August 2026 原文 ↗
  • 做多前查反向 · 来源 web · 影响 weakens
    本次更像同一AI光通信供应链主题的延续复盘,而非可验证的新催化。
    检索:Serenity Sivers CPO laser supplier prior posts 2026 原文 ↗

先例如何影响了这次决策

对本次决策的影响:先例不足强化了不把社媒复盘升级为交易订单的结论。

方向:没有足够同市场、同机制、同相位的离散先例;本条不是订单、财报、正式合作或涨价公告。

涨幅量级:无法用先例校准tp/sl,因为缺少可测量事件相位和新增事实。

形态:可迁移教训是社媒主题复盘容易引发情绪波动,但没有订单或指引时见光死风险高。

原文全文

展开原文 · 3,140 字
off the top of my head, just a recap of the themes I'm tracking:

- MLCC (actively price hiking AI server MLCCs, tightening for consumer + general purpose).

Early NAND cycle similarities, but not sure if we'll see the same type of price hikes since some LTAs were already signed we don't have a US player as aggressive as Sandisk?

Eg. Holy stone, Taiyo Yuden, Samsung electro-mechanics, Murata etc.

- InP Substrates - Extreme severity depending on who you ask:

JX/AXT/Sumitomo Electric. Ask downstream laser suppliers like $LITE, $AAOI - fine for 2027 (which is the funny part about channel checks)

Ask epiwafer suppliers like Landmark/VPEC - world is gonna end

- CW Laser (extreme severity) - many CSPs + semi leaders approaching all suppliers like $AAOI, $MTSI, to secure supply cause $LITE / $COHR have too much allocation to $NVDA.

And the latter two might have some agreements with other companies with capacity like Furukawa/Sumitomo.

-> Since $COHR said they were just using laser capacity internally and $LITE was buying EML off Coherent before if i remember correctly... So Lumentum not gonna have enough space

So my guess in $SIVE earnings is a lot of companies are probably approaching them now to do qualifications + secure allocation.

I don't know how much Sivers secured with Win and their other fabs (they started they were working with 3 back in like 2023-2024?), but we'll find out more in 3 days.

I still think their $70m fundraise might be related to securing allocations.

- CW Laser Foundries - This is Win Semi / Taiwan players.

I was surprised how little pricing these guys get compared to actual laser die output. So sticking with $SIVE and more downstream was right call for me.

Since gross margins for CPO lasers output was like 55-60% or something high (likely higher over time).

- Hybrid Bonding (rip, sorry) - pushed back to like 2029-2030 eg. Auros

- Glass Core Substrates like $LPK (ehh) - pushed back like half a year for early ramp from Samsung Electro-mEchanics + SKC Absolics. not the end of the world, but likely full ramp is 2029

- Epiwafers: Capacity constrained already eg. $IQE / Landmark

- Quantum Dot (the fun one):

QD actually surprised me most by how much focus is going into it after I looked at Sk Hynix CPO nature paper.

Probably US national security to work lessen the inP bottleneck with $ALMU and others.

My guess is $ALRIB + Veco gonna be like $AIXA for this QD equipment chokepoint in like 1 year. Most people just dont understand what Riber does is my guess.

But for actually investing in quantum epitaxial process, TAM IS MEGA MEGA SMALL. Cause it's a subset of epiwafers, and $IQE is actually a leader in this space.

You're better off looking at lasers specs these QD players produce? But it the material is super important.

For robotics (eg. battery, actuators) - my opinion is that mass production # is still too small. So I'm not really allocating much funds into upstream suppliers.

It takes a downstream leader like $CCXI, Unitree (like OpenAI/Anthropic) to hard carry the sector first, so I'm sticking with the humanoid players first.

决策记录链 · 只追加

每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。

这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。