Yet Another Value BlogCodex · 实盘不做把握 5/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 05:06:07时区推断·⟳ 抓取 12:45:24·⚡ 决策 08-05 12:47:46 +2m22s·83.2 天前
Strategy出售比特币并增发普通股后回购优先股,YAVB认为普通股溢价不合理
底层事实是Strategy出售约1.05亿美元比特币并通过普通股发行筹资约2.91亿美元,同时回购约0.81亿美元STRC优先股,方向上削弱“只增持比特币”的叙事。
📄 原文Yet Another Value Blog↗ 原文
August 2026 Random Ramblings
Strategy filed an 8K this morning: they sold $300 million of stock, sold $100 million of bitcoin, and put the proceeds…
不做 Strategy(MSTR.US)
不做:底层资本动作已在8月3日由主流媒体引用SEC filing传播,MSTR已交易完整一日且收涨;金额相对市值和比特币持仓很小,YAVB文章只是负面解读,不满足强空催化。
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)
研究档案
消息传播链
- WSJ报道Strategy上周出售1,638枚比特币、筹资约1.05亿美元,用于优先股分红和回购,说明核心事实已在8月3日美股盘中传播。
- MarketWatch引用SEC filing称Strategy出售1,638枚比特币获1.0473亿美元,并通过普通股销售筹资2.906亿美元。
- YAVB在付费文章摘要中给出负面解读,认为MSTR溢价、稀释和卖出比特币之间存在叙事冲突,但没有新增可量化事实。市场反应:MSTR在8月4日常规交易收涨2.94%。
关键理由
- 底层事实是Strategy出售约1.05亿美元比特币并通过普通股发行筹资约2.91亿美元,同时回购约0.81亿美元STRC优先股,方向上削弱“只增持比特币”的叙事。
- 但金额相对MSTR约375亿美元市值和约530亿美元比特币持仓很小,普通股发行约占市值0.8%,比特币出售约占持仓价值0.2%。
- 该事实在8月3日已被WSJ/MarketWatch报道并经历8月4日完整交易日,MSTR当日收涨2.94%,YAVB文章主要是二级解读而非新增硬事实。
主要风险
- 若后续Strategy继续扩大比特币出售或普通股融资规模,普通股溢价可能继续被压缩。
- 当前只是小额资本结构调整和研究员观点,缺少足够强的新负面事实支撑隔夜追空。
反向证据
- 做空前查反向 · 来源 web · 日期 2026-08-03 · 影响 weakens
MarketWatch称比特币在该披露后仍上涨,MSTR也在8月4日收涨,说明市场未将小额出售直接定价成强利空。
检索:Strategy MSTR sold bitcoin preferred buyback bullish counter evidence August 2026 原文 ↗ - 做空前查反向 · 来源 kb_search · 影响 none
内部KB未命中同一Strategy事件的有效研报或纪要,未提供足以增强做空的新增负面证据。
检索:Strategy MSTR 8-K sold stock sold bitcoin buy back preferred August 2026
工具调用 · 历史记录,结果未知(3 种)
- search_processed_events · 结果未知
- stock_quote · 结果未知
- kb_search · 结果未知
原文全文
展开原文 · 3,620 字
Strategy filed an 8K this morning: they sold $300 million of stock, sold $100 million of bitcoin, and put the proceeds into buying back roughly $80 million of their own preferred at a discount. So you have a company trading over NAV, diluting shareholders, and selling the one asset it exists to hold, and it is still trading at a premium. Management is presenting the move from "one-way capital issuer" to "multi-way capital issuer" like it is a financial engineering breakthrough. It is just normal capital allocation, and it took them five years to get there.
That is the through line for this whole ramble: selling. Strategy made a genuinely good call in 2020 and then never sold a thing. Situational Awareness made a generational call, long AI winners and short AI losers, went up something like 10x on it, never rebalanced, kept pressing a trade that naturally degrosses, and blew up when software went from 20 back to 30 and semis went from 400 back to 370. I do a miniature version of the same thing every time I decide in advance that I will start trimming at 15 a stock I bought at 10, and I am not sure that plan is as smart as it feels. I also get into why thematic trades are so hard to sell when there is no price to anchor to, whether the crossover funds actually had an AI information edge or just conviction, why I cannot make the memory valuations work under any assumption I am willing to make, and where I think the real opportunity is: the beaten-up AI power names Situational owned in size, several of which are not trading far above the DCF of the contracts they already have.
**This podcast is [sponsored by Trata](https://www.trata.com/glxy)**

[I](https://www.trytrata.com/wix) already know you’re going to like trata. Why? Because you’re reading this blog post, meaning you’re interested in this podcast. And trata is just like this podcast (though without the handsome host!). Trata is anonymized transcripts of buysiders discussing stocks they are following and what they really think will drive the stock. I’ve been mentioning it on the podcast for months, and the most frequent complaint I hear from people who check it out is they wish trata had **more **content on **more **of their stocks. Even better: they recently released an MCP that lets you connect their transcripts to the AI model of your choice. If you’re interested,[ check out a free transcipt on GLXY here](https://www.trata.com/glxy).
*
Please follow the podcast on [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/6ayjINs27LKDJTJjnph7zF), [iTunes](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/yet-another-value-podcast/id1526149547), or [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVCzUJIgjDKSdEOYpTqLScw)! And please be sure to rate / review the podcast if you enjoy it, or share it with someone else who would enjoy it (more listeners is a critical part of the flywheel that keeps this Substack and podcast going!).
[Share Yet Another Value Blog](https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
**Transcript for paid subs begins below (**The initial transcript is AI-generated and is replaced with a professionally edited version when available)
**Disclaimer**: Nothing on this podcast or on this blog is investing or financial advice; [please see our full disclaimer here.](https://yetanothervalueblog.substack.com/p/legal-and-disclaimer) The transcript below is from a third party transcription service; it’s entirely possible there are some errors in the transcript.
YAVP #411
That is the through line for this whole ramble: selling. Strategy made a genuinely good call in 2020 and then never sold a thing. Situational Awareness made a generational call, long AI winners and short AI losers, went up something like 10x on it, never rebalanced, kept pressing a trade that naturally degrosses, and blew up when software went from 20 back to 30 and semis went from 400 back to 370. I do a miniature version of the same thing every time I decide in advance that I will start trimming at 15 a stock I bought at 10, and I am not sure that plan is as smart as it feels. I also get into why thematic trades are so hard to sell when there is no price to anchor to, whether the crossover funds actually had an AI information edge or just conviction, why I cannot make the memory valuations work under any assumption I am willing to make, and where I think the real opportunity is: the beaten-up AI power names Situational owned in size, several of which are not trading far above the DCF of the contracts they already have.
**This podcast is [sponsored by Trata](https://www.trata.com/glxy)**

[I](https://www.trytrata.com/wix) already know you’re going to like trata. Why? Because you’re reading this blog post, meaning you’re interested in this podcast. And trata is just like this podcast (though without the handsome host!). Trata is anonymized transcripts of buysiders discussing stocks they are following and what they really think will drive the stock. I’ve been mentioning it on the podcast for months, and the most frequent complaint I hear from people who check it out is they wish trata had **more **content on **more **of their stocks. Even better: they recently released an MCP that lets you connect their transcripts to the AI model of your choice. If you’re interested,[ check out a free transcipt on GLXY here](https://www.trata.com/glxy).
*
Please follow the podcast on [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/6ayjINs27LKDJTJjnph7zF), [iTunes](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/yet-another-value-podcast/id1526149547), or [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVCzUJIgjDKSdEOYpTqLScw)! And please be sure to rate / review the podcast if you enjoy it, or share it with someone else who would enjoy it (more listeners is a critical part of the flywheel that keeps this Substack and podcast going!).
[Share Yet Another Value Blog](https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
**Transcript for paid subs begins below (**The initial transcript is AI-generated and is replaced with a professionally edited version when available)
**Disclaimer**: Nothing on this podcast or on this blog is investing or financial advice; [please see our full disclaimer here.](https://yetanothervalueblog.substack.com/p/legal-and-disclaimer) The transcript below is from a third party transcription service; it’s entirely possible there are some errors in the transcript.
YAVP #411
决策记录链 · 只追加
每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。
这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。