📰 The InformationThe InformationCodex · 实盘不做把握 6/10不做原因:风险收益比不佳
北京时间·🕒 发布 02:51:58时区推断·⟳ 抓取 02:52:23·⚡ 决策 09-03 03:15:22 +22m59s·54.8 天前
美国政府在《纽约时报》诉OpenAI版权案中支持AI训练适用fair use
事件方向对AI训练方偏利好、对出版方偏利空，但这是诉讼中的政府意见书而非裁判结果；OpenAI不可交易，微软体量过大且事件财务弹性不足，纽约时报做空催化不够强。
📄 原文The Information↗ 原文
Trump Administration Sides with OpenAI In Legal Battle with New York Times
The Trump administration backed OpenAI in its legal battle with the New York Times, arguing in a brief that barring AI…
不做 微软（MSFT.US）
OpenAI相关法律风险边际下降，但微软市值和业务体量过大，本次只是非终局法律意见书，短线可交易弹性不足。
不做 纽约时报公司（NYT.US）
事件对诉讼预期偏负面，但不是败诉或经营基本面恶化；看空催化强度不足以开SHORT。
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)
研究档案
结论摘要
美国政府支持OpenAI fair use抗辩降低了AI训练版权诉讼的政策风险，但法律结果尚未落地，且对可交易标的的短线财务影响较小。微软受益过于分散，纽约时报受损也主要是诉讼期望下降而非经营现金流立即受损，因此没有正期望清晰的交易腿。
消息传播链
- Reuters称美国政府已在曼哈顿联邦法院提交支持OpenAI的brief，但当前未直接取得法院原始文件链接。
- TechCrunch报道美国政府提交20页brief支持OpenAI未授权训练LLM的fair use立场。
- Reuters报道该brief可能提振科技公司对抗AI训练版权诉讼。市场反应:Investing页面显示MSFT当时约-0.86%、NYT约+0.16%，未见单票强烈同向反应。
- The Information在抓取时间附近报道政府支持OpenAI，进一步扩散到AI投资者群体。
关键理由
- 对微软而言，政府支持fair use有助于降低OpenAI/Copilot训练数据许可和诉讼尾部风险，但相对微软收入、利润和市值弹性很小。
- 对纽约时报公司而言，该brief削弱其版权诉讼谈判筹码，但尚未形成败诉、赔偿归零或订阅/广告业务损害。
- OpenAI未上市，最直接的利好无法直接交易。
主要风险
- 法院可能不采纳政府意见，后续裁判或和解仍可能要求赔偿或授权。
- 若市场把该消息解读为AI版权风险系统性下降，AI大盘股可能有主题性买盘，但单一事件对微软缺少足够幅度锚。
反向证据
- 做多前查反向 · 来源 web · 日期 2026-09-02 · 影响 weakens
公开报道均显示这是政府提交的法律意见书，不是法院裁判；对微软的财务影响尚未落地。
检索:OpenAI New York Times lawsuit DOJ brief not final ruling fair use risks Microsoft 原文 ↗ - 做空前查反向 · 来源 web · 日期 2026-09-02 · 影响 weakens
政府立场不利于纽约时报诉讼主张，但未构成公司经营损害、败诉裁判或正式下调预期。
检索:New York Times OpenAI copyright lawsuit government brief fair use impact NYT 原文 ↗
先例如何影响了这次决策
对本次决策的影响:先例不足使本次不采用ENTER；对微软不追软利好，对纽约时报不因诉讼筹码受挫直接开空。
方向:缺少同一机制、同一相位且可干净锚定的公开先例；方向只能作为AI版权法律风险下降的定性利好。
涨幅量级:没有足够高相似先例校准微软或纽约时报的1/3/5日反应幅度。
形态:法律程序节点常见反应取决于是否为终局裁判或和解金额，本次只是政府意见书，容易被视为软催化。
工具执行结果 · 成功 1 · 降级 0 · 失败 0 · 取消 0
- web_search 成功 ? · 0 ms
原文全文
展开原文 · 1,693 字
The Trump administration backed OpenAI in its legal battle with the New York Times, arguing in a brief that barring AI companies from training their models on publishers’ output would be unfair and hurt U.S. technological competitiveness.
The legal brief, filed by lawyers for the Department of Justice with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that the Times is seeking an overly narrow definition of “fair use” that would improperly restrict how large language models are trained.
The Times sued OpenAI and its early partner and backer Microsoft in 2023, alleging that the companies had violated the news organization’s copyright protections by training OpenAI on its content.
The Trump administration’s brief argued that training AI models on copyrighted material doesn’t inherently violate copyright laws, and that defining fair use too narrowly would hurt competition for the U.S. broadly and among AI companies, because smaller companies might not be able to afford licensing fees.
“It is not in the public’s interest for the largest technology companies to have an oligopoly on LLM training due to licensing entry barriers that function primarily as large subsidies for old mainstream media companies,” the brief says.
The brief is consistent with both the administration’s longstanding antipathy toward the Times and other mainstream news outlets and President Trump’s prior statements that AI progress is too important for U.S. competitiveness to be hampered by stringent copyright protections.
Justice Department lawyers argue in legal brief that preventing models from being trained on copyrighted material would hurt U.S. competitiveness in AI
The legal brief, filed by lawyers for the Department of Justice with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that the Times is seeking an overly narrow definition of “fair use” that would improperly restrict how large language models are trained.
The Times sued OpenAI and its early partner and backer Microsoft in 2023, alleging that the companies had violated the news organization’s copyright protections by training OpenAI on its content.
The Trump administration’s brief argued that training AI models on copyrighted material doesn’t inherently violate copyright laws, and that defining fair use too narrowly would hurt competition for the U.S. broadly and among AI companies, because smaller companies might not be able to afford licensing fees.
“It is not in the public’s interest for the largest technology companies to have an oligopoly on LLM training due to licensing entry barriers that function primarily as large subsidies for old mainstream media companies,” the brief says.
The brief is consistent with both the administration’s longstanding antipathy toward the Times and other mainstream news outlets and President Trump’s prior statements that AI progress is too important for U.S. competitiveness to be hampered by stringent copyright protections.
Justice Department lawyers argue in legal brief that preventing models from being trained on copyrighted material would hurt U.S. competitiveness in AI
决策记录链 · 只追加
每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。
这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。