Federal Register (AI Policies)Doubao · 实盘不做把握 8/10不做原因:消息已过时
北京时间·🕒 发布 10-08(美东日)仅日期·时区推断·⟳ 抓取 13:22:15·⚡ 决策 10-09 13:23:38 +1m23s·18.2 天前
美国ITC正式终止Netlist诉三星/谷歌/超微DRAM专利337调查，但实质和解早在8月已公布
联邦公报通知只是对9月4日ALJ初裁、且源于8月5日已公开三星-Netlist战略联盟（2.39亿美元预付授权费、五年最高8.97亿美元、交叉许可与供货协议）的程序性确认，不含任何新金额、新条款或新监管动作，相关标的已充分消化该催化。
📄 原文Federal Register (AI Policies)↗ 原文
64678 Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2026 / Notices Authority: These reviews are being conduc…
不做 Netlist, Inc.（NLST.US）
联邦公报终止调查系8月5日已公布三星和解（2.39亿美元预付款、最高8.97亿美元）的程序性尾单，无增量事实且利好已充分price-in，追入仅承担见光死风险
不做 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.（005930.KS）
和解条款两月前已披露，对三星市值不构成重大新增影响，ITC终止通知无交易edge
不做 Google LLC（GOOGL.US）
谷歌随三星和解脱身的结果8月已知，本通知无新增信息
不做 Super Micro Computer, Inc.（SMCI.US）
超微作为下游被告被和解覆盖，禁令风险解除早已定价，程序性终止不构成催化
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)
研究档案
结论摘要
ITC正式终止Netlist对三星/谷歌/超微的DRAM 337调查，但这只是8月5日已公布的三星2.39亿美元和解与战略联盟的程序性收尾，无新增事实，不构成可交易edge。
消息传播链
- ITC公告不复议Order No.31、337-TA-1472调查正式终止；表决日为10月6日，公报10月8日提交，属纯程序性确认
关键理由
- 实质利好（三星预付2.39亿美元、五年潜在总额8.97亿美元的交叉许可、供货与技术合作）已于2026-08-05公开并经8-K备案
- 10月9日联邦公报仅确认不复议9月初裁，和解动议、谷歌/超微不反对等关键信息此前均已披露
主要风险
- 若和解协议的保密版本中存在尚未公开的附加条款，理论上可能构成增量，但公告明确表示不存在其他书面或口头协议
- 美股盘前无法即时成交，且基于两个月旧闻追入Netlist显著面临利好出尽风险
反向证据
- 做多前查反向 · 来源 web · 日期 2026-08-05 · 影响 supports
和解主要金额（2.39亿美元预付、季度3290万美元、最高8.97亿美元）及联盟结构均已在8月5日公开，未发现10月新增的实质条款；ITC公告还明确双方无其他相关协议
检索:Netlist Samsung settlement August 2026 terms 8-K additional undisclosed payments 原文 ↗
先例如何影响了这次决策
对本次决策的影响:未调用event_study；因为缺乏新增事实，任何先例统计都无法为本通知创造交易edge
方向:无需先例：本条不构成新催化，仅是已公开和解的程序性收尾，历史涨幅统计不会改变STALE判定
涨幅量级:不适用
形态:不适用
工具执行结果 · 成功 2 · 降级 0 · 失败 0 · 取消 0
- search_processed_events 成功 stock_tools HTTP · 12 ms
{"result": "search_processed_events:agent query=`337-ta-1472 initial determination settlement investigation terminated | netlist dram patent litigation settlement google super micro itc terminated | netlist samsung 337-ta-1472 dr`；结构化索引覆盖完整 72 小时；旧记录兼容扫描近 0.0/72 小时、0 条本臂决策(完整)，返回 0 条候选。未命中只表示这些 agen - web_search 成功 doubao_search · 5,766 ms
豆包搜索结果（原始查询:Netlist Samsung settlement August 2026 ITC 337-TA-1472 DRAM patent license agreement；API SearchType:web）
原文全文
展开原文 · 7,175 字
64678
Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2026 / Notices
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
published pursuant to section 207.62 of
the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 6, 2026.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026–20715 Filed 10–8–26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1472]
Certain Dynamic Random Access
Memory (DRAM) Devices, Products
Containing the Same, and Components
Thereof; Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the
Investigation Based on Settlement;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 31)
issued by the presiding administrative
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting an
unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation based on settlement. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Houda Morad, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–4716. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 2, 2026, based on a
complaint filed by Netlist, Inc.
(‘‘Netlist’’ or ‘‘Complainant’’) of Irvine,
California. 91 FR 155–56 (Jan. 2, 2026).
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain dynamic random
access memory (DRAM) devices,
products containing the same, and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 12,373,366 (‘‘the ’366
patent’’); 10,025,731 (‘‘the ’731 patent’’);
10,268,608 (‘‘the ’608 patent’’);
10,217,523 (‘‘the ’523 patent’’); the ’035
patent; and 12,308,087 (‘‘the ’087
patent’’). Id. The complaint further
alleges that a domestic industry exists or
is in the process of being established. Id.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents: (1)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon,
Republic of Korea; Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. of Plano, Texas; and
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of Plano,
Texas (collectively, ‘‘Samsung’’); (2)
Google LLC (‘‘Google’’) of Mountain
View, California; and (3) Super Micro
Computer, Inc. (‘‘SMC’’) of San Jose,
California (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’).
Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also
participating in the investigation. Id.
On August 24, 2026, the Commission
partially terminated the investigation as
to all asserted claims of the ’035 patent,
claims 2 and 3 of the ’608 patent, claims
11 and 15 of the ’366 patent, claims 7–
9 and 12–16 of the ’731 patent, claims
17 and 18 of the ’523 patent, and claims
5, 7, 17, 20, 22, and 23 of the ’087 patent
based on withdrawal of the complaint
allegations as to those claims. See Order
No. 29 (July 23, 2026), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Aug. 24, 2026).
On August 18, 2026, Netlist and
Samsung (collectively, ‘‘the Settling
Parties’’) filed a joint motion (‘‘Mot.’’) to
terminate the investigation as to all
Respondents based on settlement. The
motion notes that agreements between
the Settling parties (‘‘Agreements’’)
‘‘completely resolve the dispute
between the Settling Parties in this
Investigation, as well as between Netlist
and any remaining Respondents who
receive their accused products from the
Samsung Respondents.’’ Mot. at 2. The
motion also indicates that Google and
SMC do not oppose the motion. Id. at
5. On August 27, 2026, OUII filed a
response in support of the motion.
On September 4, 2026, the ALJ issued
the subject ID (Order No. 31) granting
the motion to terminate pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR
210.21(b)(1)). The ID notes that the
motion includes confidential and public
versions of the Agreements as well as a
statement that ‘‘there are no other
agreements, written or oral, express or
implied, between the Settling Parties
concerning the subject matter of this
Investigation.’’ ID at 2–3. The ID also
notes that ‘‘the public interest favors
settlement to avoid unnecessary
litigation and to conserve public and
private resources.’’ Id. at 3. The ID
concludes that the motion complies
with Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1). Id.
at 4. The ALJ also granted the Settling
Parties’ request to limit service of the
Agreements. Id.
No party filed a petition for review of
the subject ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID (Order No. 31).
The investigation is terminated.
The Commission’s vote for this
determination took place on October 6,
2026.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 6, 2026.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026–20716 Filed 10–8–26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure; Meeting of the Judicial
Conference
AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the
United States, Committee on Rules of
Practice and Procedure.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
SUMMARY: The Committee on Rules of
Practice and Procedure will hold an in-
person meeting on January 5, 2027 in
Washington, DC. The meeting will be
conducted in hybrid format with virtual
attendance options available. The
meeting is open to the public for
observation but not participation. A
meeting agenda and supporting
materials will be posted at least 7 days
in advance of the meeting at: https://
www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/records-
rules-committees/agenda-books.
DATES: January 5, 2027 (meeting date)
and December 29, 2026 (registration
deadline for in-person observation).
ADDRESSES: Requests to observe must be
made in writing by emailing the request
to: RulesCommittee_Secretary@
ao.uscourts.gov. Please see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Oct 08, 2026
Jkt 271001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
lotter on DSK8BHNXB4PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2026 / Notices
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
published pursuant to section 207.62 of
the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 6, 2026.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026–20715 Filed 10–8–26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1472]
Certain Dynamic Random Access
Memory (DRAM) Devices, Products
Containing the Same, and Components
Thereof; Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the
Investigation Based on Settlement;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 31)
issued by the presiding administrative
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting an
unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation based on settlement. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Houda Morad, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–4716. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 2, 2026, based on a
complaint filed by Netlist, Inc.
(‘‘Netlist’’ or ‘‘Complainant’’) of Irvine,
California. 91 FR 155–56 (Jan. 2, 2026).
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain dynamic random
access memory (DRAM) devices,
products containing the same, and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 12,373,366 (‘‘the ’366
patent’’); 10,025,731 (‘‘the ’731 patent’’);
10,268,608 (‘‘the ’608 patent’’);
10,217,523 (‘‘the ’523 patent’’); the ’035
patent; and 12,308,087 (‘‘the ’087
patent’’). Id. The complaint further
alleges that a domestic industry exists or
is in the process of being established. Id.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents: (1)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon,
Republic of Korea; Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. of Plano, Texas; and
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of Plano,
Texas (collectively, ‘‘Samsung’’); (2)
Google LLC (‘‘Google’’) of Mountain
View, California; and (3) Super Micro
Computer, Inc. (‘‘SMC’’) of San Jose,
California (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’).
Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also
participating in the investigation. Id.
On August 24, 2026, the Commission
partially terminated the investigation as
to all asserted claims of the ’035 patent,
claims 2 and 3 of the ’608 patent, claims
11 and 15 of the ’366 patent, claims 7–
9 and 12–16 of the ’731 patent, claims
17 and 18 of the ’523 patent, and claims
5, 7, 17, 20, 22, and 23 of the ’087 patent
based on withdrawal of the complaint
allegations as to those claims. See Order
No. 29 (July 23, 2026), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Aug. 24, 2026).
On August 18, 2026, Netlist and
Samsung (collectively, ‘‘the Settling
Parties’’) filed a joint motion (‘‘Mot.’’) to
terminate the investigation as to all
Respondents based on settlement. The
motion notes that agreements between
the Settling parties (‘‘Agreements’’)
‘‘completely resolve the dispute
between the Settling Parties in this
Investigation, as well as between Netlist
and any remaining Respondents who
receive their accused products from the
Samsung Respondents.’’ Mot. at 2. The
motion also indicates that Google and
SMC do not oppose the motion. Id. at
5. On August 27, 2026, OUII filed a
response in support of the motion.
On September 4, 2026, the ALJ issued
the subject ID (Order No. 31) granting
the motion to terminate pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR
210.21(b)(1)). The ID notes that the
motion includes confidential and public
versions of the Agreements as well as a
statement that ‘‘there are no other
agreements, written or oral, express or
implied, between the Settling Parties
concerning the subject matter of this
Investigation.’’ ID at 2–3. The ID also
notes that ‘‘the public interest favors
settlement to avoid unnecessary
litigation and to conserve public and
private resources.’’ Id. at 3. The ID
concludes that the motion complies
with Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1). Id.
at 4. The ALJ also granted the Settling
Parties’ request to limit service of the
Agreements. Id.
No party filed a petition for review of
the subject ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID (Order No. 31).
The investigation is terminated.
The Commission’s vote for this
determination took place on October 6,
2026.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 6, 2026.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026–20716 Filed 10–8–26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure; Meeting of the Judicial
Conference
AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the
United States, Committee on Rules of
Practice and Procedure.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
SUMMARY: The Committee on Rules of
Practice and Procedure will hold an in-
person meeting on January 5, 2027 in
Washington, DC. The meeting will be
conducted in hybrid format with virtual
attendance options available. The
meeting is open to the public for
observation but not participation. A
meeting agenda and supporting
materials will be posted at least 7 days
in advance of the meeting at: https://
www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/records-
rules-committees/agenda-books.
DATES: January 5, 2027 (meeting date)
and December 29, 2026 (registration
deadline for in-person observation).
ADDRESSES: Requests to observe must be
made in writing by emailing the request
to: RulesCommittee_Secretary@
ao.uscourts.gov. Please see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Oct 08, 2026
Jkt 271001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
lotter on DSK8BHNXB4PROD with NOTICES1
决策记录链 · 只追加
每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。
6b354d6edb· 2026-10-09 13:23 · doubao / doubao-seed-evolving-latest-version · 策略包d5018cb8913f当前