摩根大通Codex · 实盘重复把握 7/10
北京时间·🕒 发布 17:23:05时区推断·⟳ 抓取 17:28:35·⚡ 决策 07-28 17:33:52 +5m17s·91.0 天前
Cadence二季度业绩超预期并上调全年指引,AI芯片设计需求推动订单积压创新高
Cadence二季度收入15.84亿美元、Non-GAAP EPS 2.11美元,EPS高于市场预期2.05美元,全年收入和EPS指引均上修。
📄 原文摩根大通↗ 原文
Cadence’s (CDNS) 2Q26 print and updated FY26 outlook reinforce a broadening improvement in demand across the business,…
▼ 亏 -3.50%入场 07-27 盘后首笔 @346.19 → 离场 07-28 常规开盘 @335.16
决策后走势暂无图(这条腿还没有复盘打分的日线切片)
💡 交易逻辑业绩上修+AI需求验证,开盘限价做多
怎么买 限价买入 不高于昨收 +4%、仅下一个交易日,不成交作废
怎么卖 止盈 +5%(半仓)/+9%(清仓) · 止损 -4% · 时间止损 3日
展开详情(成交明细 / 研究档案 / 原文全文 / 决策记录链)
分时走势
做多 CDNS.US Cadence Design Systems
建仓日早于近 30 天,只有日线图
成交明细 · 纸面
做多 CDNS.US Cadence Design Systems
| 收益状态 | -3.50% 已平仓 |
|---|---|
| 进场成交 | 2026-07-27 · 盘后首笔 · 07-28 04:12 北京 · @346.186 |
| 离场成交 | 2026-07-28 · 常规开盘 · @335.16 |
| 毛收益 | -3.19% |
| 成本 | +0.32% |
| 净收益 | -3.50% |
| 计入收益 | -3.50% |
| 计入 | 同日重复,不计入曲线 |
| 建仓日 | 2026-07-27 · 进场不早于新闻时刻 + 2 分钟 |
收益口径 event_time_plus_2min_10min_walk_open_topup_to_next_open_exchange_calendar_fill_model_local_notional_v9 · method_id m8db1cbc8f2d · 截至 2026-10-27 17:15
研究档案
消息传播链
- 公司正式披露二季度业绩、81亿美元backlog,并上调2026年收入、EPS和经营现金流指引。
- Reuters报道Cadence因AI芯片设计需求上调全年收入和利润预测,盘后股价上涨超过5%。市场反应:盘后上涨超过5%。
- Barron's确认EPS和收入超预期、全年指引上修,并记录盘前上涨约3.02%。市场反应:盘前上涨约3.02%。
- Yahoo显示CDNS收盘338.61美元,夜盘347.29美元,较收盘上涨2.56%。市场反应:夜盘347.29美元,+2.56%。
关键理由
- Cadence二季度收入15.84亿美元、Non-GAAP EPS 2.11美元,EPS高于市场预期2.05美元,全年收入和EPS指引均上修。
- 公司披露季度末backlog达81亿美元,未来12个月RPO为42亿美元,说明AI/HPC芯片设计需求已转化为可见收入。
- 量级上,全年收入中值约63亿美元、同比约19%,相对公司约950亿美元级市值不是低基数噪音,但盘前已涨约2.6%,只适合小仓限价参与。
主要风险
- 财报后已出现隔夜/盘前重定价,若开盘高开过多容易高开低走。
- 中国业务占比仍高,去年出口管制和解罚款后的合规风险会压制估值倍数。
反向证据
- 做多前查反向 · 来源 web · 日期 2026-07-28 · 影响 weakens
Barron's提到Cadence去年因非法技术出口被罚1.4亿美元,中国销售占二季度收入15%,合规风险削弱估值扩张但不否定本次业绩上修。
检索:Cadence Q2 2026 earnings China export controls fine risk 原文 ↗
历史先例(按相似度)
- 相似度 9/10 CDNS 2024-07-22 Cadence Q2 2024披露backlog约60亿美元并上调2024收入展望至约13%同比增长,管理层明确提到AI、hyperscale、汽车客户需求。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 -1.4% · +2日 -7.2% · +3日 -10.0% · +4日 -9.8% · +5日 -9.8%
相似度依据:同主体、同为Q2业绩超预期/上调全年展望/AI与hyperscale需求推动backlog,事件机制和相位高度一致。 - 相似度 8/10 SNPS 2024-12-04 Synopsys FY2024 Q4收入和非GAAP EPS均高于指引中点,并预计2025年双位数收入增长,称AI-driven compute扩大其silicon-to-systems机会。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 -12.4% · +2日 -12.0% · +3日 -13.5% · +4日 -14.1% · +5日 -12.9%
相似度依据:同为美国EDA龙头业绩超预期并给出下一年度双位数增长展望,AI驱动研发复杂度提升的逻辑相近,但不是同主体且backlog披露口径不同。 - 相似度 8/10 ARM 2024-02-07 Arm FY2024 Q3收入8.24亿美元、调整EPS 0.29美元均超预期,并将全年收入指引上调至31.55亿-32.05亿美元,次日因AI需求叙事大涨。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 +47.9% · +2日 +49.6% · +3日 +93.4% · +4日 +55.8% · +5日 +64.1%
相似度依据:同为AI芯片设计链核心资产,业绩超预期并大幅上调全年指引,AI需求验证强;但ARM是IP授权/版税模式,弹性和估值相位比CDNS更极端。 - 相似度 7/10 CDNS 2026-04-27 Cadence一季度披露80亿美元backlog并上调全年收入增长至约17%,属于同主体业绩上修先例。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 -3.3% · +2日 -2.0% · +3日 -2.1% · +4日 +1.3% · +5日 +3.9%
相似度依据:同为Cadence季度财报后上调全年收入展望,但Q1已是强势确认,当前Q2同时有更明确AI和竞争位置改善。 - 相似度 7/10 ARM 2024-05-08 Arm 2024年5月财报虽季度收入指引高于一致预期,但全年收入展望未能打动已大幅上涨的市场,盘后下跌约7%-10%。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 -2.3% · +2日 +2.6% · +3日 +10.5% · +4日 +10.0% · +5日 +7.2%
相似度依据:同为AI芯片设计链财报催化且收入/EPS超预期,但全年指引未满足高预期,适合作为高估值AI链见光死反例。 - 相似度 7/10 MRVL 2024-12-03 Marvell FY2025 Q3调整EPS 0.43美元、收入15.2亿美元均超预期,并因AI相关产品需求强劲给出乐观Q4展望,盘前一度涨近13%。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 +23.2% · +2日 +18.2% · +3日 +18.4% · +4日 +11.6% · +5日 +11.2%
相似度依据:同为美国AI半导体链,业绩超预期并给强指引验证AI需求;但MRVL是芯片/互连供给侧,收入波动和周期性高于EDA软件。 - 相似度 7/10 AVGO 2024-12-12 Broadcom FY2024收入515.74亿美元,AI收入122亿美元同比增长220%,并给出FY2025 Q1收入约146亿美元指引。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 +24.4% · +2日 +38.4% · +3日 +33.0% · +4日 +23.8% · +5日 +20.9%
相似度依据:同为美国AI基础设施链,财报披露AI收入高速增长并给出下一季增长指引;但AVGO体量更大且含VMware软件整合因素。 - 相似度 7/10 NVDA 2023-05-24 Nvidia FY2024 Q1财报后给出远超预期的FY2024 Q2收入指引约110亿美元,成为AI基础设施需求兑现的标志性财报先例。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 +24.4% · +2日 +27.5% · +3日 +31.4% · +4日 +23.9% · +5日 +30.2%
相似度依据:同为AI需求验证型业绩/指引上修,市场用强订单与数据中心需求重估AI链;但NVDA是核心GPU供给商,弹性远高于EDA软件。 - 相似度 6/10 ANSS 2025-02-19 Ansys Q4 2024收入8.82亿美元、非GAAP EPS 4.44美元,FY2024 ACV增长11%,期末deferred revenue and backlog为17.18亿美元。 原文 ↗
测ANSS在2025-02-20起的+1/+3/+5交易日反应。
相似度依据:同属工程/仿真软件、高毛利订阅与ACV/backlog驱动,Q4业绩强且ACV双位数增长;但并非EDA纯标的且当时受SNPS并购套利约束。 - 相似度 6/10 3443 2026-04-23 Global Unichip 2026年4月23日公布EPS 12.28新台币、预测8.74,EPS surprise约+40.5%,Investing.com记录财报反应约+9.80%。 原文 ↗
测3443.TW在2026-04-24起的+1/+3/+5交易日反应。
相似度依据:同为AI ASIC/芯片设计供应链订单与盈利弹性验证,EPS大幅超预期;但台湾市场、ASIC服务模式和日内涨跌幅机制不同于美国EDA。 - 相似度 6/10 3661 2023-08-21 Alchip将2023年收入预测从8亿美元上调至9亿-9.5亿美元,反映AI/HPC ASIC需求和产能改善。 原文 ↗
测3661.TW在2023-08-22起的+1/+3/+5交易日反应。
相似度依据:同为AI/HPC ASIC链因需求强而上调全年收入展望,订单/产能兑现逻辑相近;但台湾ASIC设计服务股较CDNS更受单一客户和CoWoS产能影响。 - 相似度 4/10 301269 2025-04-28 Empyrean 2024年净利同比下降45.5%、收入同比增长21%,Reuters/TradingView称股价下跌约4%,显示EDA题材在利润恶化时会被压制。 原文 ↗
事件后 +1日 +0.1% · +2日 +0.5% · +3日 +2.4% · +4日 +1.6% · +5日 +0.6%
相似度依据:同为EDA软件标的财报事件,但利润下滑而非业绩上修,作为同品类负向反例更适合衡量EDA估值对盈利质量的敏感性。
原文全文
展开原文 · 4,195 字
Cadence’s (CDNS) 2Q26 print and updated FY26 outlook reinforce a broadening improvement in demand across the business, with backlog exiting the quarter at a record $8.1B and both the 3Q and FY26 guides being raised on stronger AI-driven chip design activity, improving analog / mature chip design activity, incremental TAM expansion from agentic AI, and what management described as a materially stronger competitive position. Strength during the quarter was broad-based, with IP up >40% Y/Y, core EDA up 18%, hardware at another record, and System Design & Analysis up 37%, all driven by AI/HPC demand, advanced-node activity, memory bandwidth, chiplets, advanced packaging, and Hexagon DNA integration. At the midpoint, the FY26 outlook now implies ~19% Y/Y revenue growth, underpinned by a better overall design environment, deeper customer engagements, and share/positioning gains. Customer commentary was particularly strong this quarter, with CDNS expanding its collaboration with Intel (INTC) to support the 14A process through its design tools, IP, and agentic AI-based EDA — a major milestone given management’s acknowledgement that CDNS has historically been better positioned in the TSMC ecosystem than at Intel and Samsung. The INTC agreement is multi-year, spans EDA, DTCO, agentic AI/EDA solutions, and IP, and should contribute some benefit this year, with the larger opportunity accruing in future years. CDNS also deepened its Samsung Foundry collaboration around 2nm and 3D IC technologies, continued its work with TSMC on advanced packaging and 3D IC, and highlighted Rapidus’s collaboration around Cadence’s AI agent technology — all pointing to improving competitive positioning in digital, verification, signoff, IP, and advanced-node enablement. In response to recent concerns around Kimi K3 and broader AI-driven software automation, management emphasized its view that agentic AI is more likely to expand, rather than cannibalize, CDNS’s opportunity, as AI agents should enable engineers to test more design alternatives and therefore drive more frequent use of CDNS’s core EDA engines. While management’s guide does not assume a sudden step-function uplift from agentic AI, the level of engagement, breadth of use cases, and early productivity metrics suggest monetization is moving from conceptual upside toward tangible add-on/usage-based activity, with CDNS’s ChipStack and ViraStack AI Super Agents now having more than 20 and 25 customer engagements, respectively. Net-net, we believe CDNS’s 2Q26 print should support positive consensus revisions and further confidence in CDNS’s medium-term growth algorithm, as the company delivered a clean beat-and-raise, exited with a record backlog, showed broad-based segment strength, and provided more concrete evidence that agentic AI is becoming a strong demand accelerator rather than a structural headwind. As such, we reiterate our OW rating and establish our new Dec-27 price target of $405, which assumes CDNS trades at 43-45x (44x) our CY27 EPS estimate of ~$9.15, in line with comparable peers in the tech/design software IP space.
Summary Investment Thesis and Valuation
Investment Thesis
The EDA (electronic design automation) software segment should generate 10-15% revenue growth for its core tools. The bulk of the market share in this space is divided among three vendors, Cadence, Synopsys (SNPS/OW), and Siemens (through its acquisition of Mentor Graphics). This provides a very stable but fierce competitive environment, with vendors constantly looking to gain and defend market share through incremental product innovation. We believe Cadence’s investment into 3D solvers opens up a larger addressable market and that a shift toward more cyclically exposed names will further boost growth. Given the underperformance in the stock in CY25 and so far YTD, combined with strong chip design activity and potential for share gains, we see upside to revenue/EPS over the next few quarters driving the stock to our price target.
Valuation
Our Dec-27 price target of $405 is based on a ~44x P/E multiple, in line with comparable group (tech/design software/IP) applied to ~$9.15 of earnings power exiting CY27E.
Summary Investment Thesis and Valuation
Investment Thesis
The EDA (electronic design automation) software segment should generate 10-15% revenue growth for its core tools. The bulk of the market share in this space is divided among three vendors, Cadence, Synopsys (SNPS/OW), and Siemens (through its acquisition of Mentor Graphics). This provides a very stable but fierce competitive environment, with vendors constantly looking to gain and defend market share through incremental product innovation. We believe Cadence’s investment into 3D solvers opens up a larger addressable market and that a shift toward more cyclically exposed names will further boost growth. Given the underperformance in the stock in CY25 and so far YTD, combined with strong chip design activity and potential for share gains, we see upside to revenue/EPS over the next few quarters driving the stock to our price target.
Valuation
Our Dec-27 price target of $405 is based on a ~44x P/E multiple, in line with comparable group (tech/design software/IP) applied to ~$9.15 of earnings power exiting CY27E.
决策记录链 · 只追加
每次领取产生一条记录,重新决策追加一条并以 supersedes 指向被替代的记录(ADR 0014)。
这条决策早于决策账本(2026-10-08 起逐条追加),没有追加记录。